President William Ruto has promised to remove financial background as a barrier to higher education, but the proposed Tertiary Education, Placement and Funding Bill, 2026 will ultimately be judged by a harder question: will poor students receive genuine educational support, or will they simply gain access to higher education by taking on more debt?
Ruto says the proposed legislation will reform student placement and financing so that every qualified student can pursue higher education regardless of background. That is a powerful promise, but the Bill now before Parliament must translate that promise into a financing system that is affordable to the State, understandable to families and fair to graduates. The distinction is crucial because universal funding is not necessarily universal scholarship. A student can receive enough financial assistance to enter university or a TVET institution while still accumulating an obligation that must eventually be repaid. For a young graduate who enters a poorly paid job, or remains unemployed, the difference between a grant and a loan can determine whether the reform becomes an opportunity or a long-term financial burden.
This is why the Bill deserves to be examined not merely as an administrative reform but as a potential turning point in Kenya's higher-education financing policy. The proposed framework seeks to bring student placement and financing into a more integrated system, which is significant because admission without financing has little meaning for a student whose family cannot meet the cost of staying in college. Tuition is only one part of the problem; accommodation, food, transport, books, digital devices and other learning requirements can determine whether a student remains in an institution after admission. A financing model that focuses overwhelmingly on tuition while leaving these costs unresolved could still leave the poorest students struggling to complete their studies.
The Bill therefore needs to answer a simple but fundamental question: what does the Government mean by access? Is access merely the right to obtain a place in a university or TVET institution, or does it mean providing sufficient support for a student to complete the programme? That distinction should occupy Parliament and education stakeholders as they scrutinise the proposed framework.
The placement provisions also deserve close attention. As Kenya expands multiple pathways through the Competency-Based Education system, placement is becoming an increasingly important transition point for learners. The system must ensure that students understand where they have been placed, why they have been placed there and what mechanisms exist for challenging an unsuitable placement. A placement system that is efficient for administrators but confusing for students would not solve the problem.
The financing model faces an even bigger test. Kenya cannot promise universal access without establishing a reliable source of funding capable of supporting the growing number of students entering universities, TVET institutions and other tertiary colleges. The State must therefore demonstrate how the proposed system will be financed over the long term and how it will protect students when economic circumstances change.
The most vulnerable students require particular attention. For a wealthy family, a shortfall in student funding may be inconvenient; for a poor household, it can mean a student abandoning education altogether. That is why financial assessment, appeals and protection for vulnerable learners cannot be treated as technical details; they are central to whether the new system delivers equal opportunity.
Loan repayment is another area requiring clarity. Students and parents need to know precisely what constitutes a loan, what constitutes non-repayable support, when repayment begins and how graduates who are unemployed or earning very little will be treated. A graduate should not be placed in an impossible financial position simply because the system succeeded in getting them through the university gate.
The transition from the existing funding arrangements to the proposed framework will also require careful management. Thousands of students are already navigating the current funding system, and Parliament and the Government must ensure that legislative reform does not create uncertainty over who qualifies, who pays, how applications are processed or which rules apply to continuing students. The reform should make higher education financing simpler, not more complicated. It should also make accountability clearer. Students need to know which institution is responsible for their funding, where to lodge an appeal and who answers when money is delayed. Universities and TVET institutions likewise need predictable financing arrangements so that students are not caught between government agencies and institutions.
Ultimately, the debate surrounding the Bill should move beyond political declarations. Ruto has articulated the objective: expand access so that a student's background does not determine whether they can pursue higher education. Parliament's task is to determine whether the proposed legal framework can deliver that objective without creating new inequalities.
The strongest test will be the student from a poor household who qualifies for university, receives the promised support, completes the degree and enters the labour market. If that student can access education, complete it and manage the resulting financial obligation without being pushed into distress, the reform will have addressed a genuine national problem. If access simply means replacing today's inability to pay fees with tomorrow's inability to repay loans, the country will have solved one barrier while creating another.
That is why the Tertiary Education, Placement and Funding Bill, 2026 deserves scrutiny far beyond its administrative provisions. It could determine not only who gets into higher education, but also what Kenyan graduates owe the State when they come out. The promise is universal access. The legislation must now determine what that promise will actually cost students, families and taxpayers.
By Hillary Muhalya
Reader Discussion (0)
Sign in to comment